bahrainthismonth.com | OCTOBER 2026 OPINION 74 When The Letters Stop Working Real Estate and Property Management are at the core of Bill Grieve’s experience, and in this article he offers his latest thoughts. There comes a point when unpaid service charges cease to be an accounting problem and become a legal one. For owners’ associations struggling with chronic debt, choosing the right lawyers may determine whether money remains on a spreadsheet or finally reaches the bank. There is a peculiar phenomenon in residential property management. An owner owes service charges. A statement is sent, but nothing happens. A reminder follows and still nothing happens. Another reminder is sent, perhaps this time with URGENT in the subject line. Again, nothing happens. Months become years. The outstanding amount grows, management continues corresponding and everybody gradually becomes accustomed to seeing the debt sitting on an aged receivables report. Meanwhile, the building needs money. Lifts require maintenance, pumps need repairs, security guards and cleaners need to be paid, insurance falls due, fire and safety systems require servicing and contractors want settlement. Preventative maintenance cannot be paid for with promises. Eventually, somebody needs to recognise a simple fact: the letters are not working. Good owners should not finance bad ones Service charges are not optional contributions to a club. They fund the operation, maintenance and preservation of assets that are collectively owned and enjoyed. Chronic non-payment therefore creates an extraordinary unfairness: the owners who pay effectively subsidise those who do not. The compliant owner pays on time while somebody else continues enjoying the same entrance, lifts, lighting, security, cleaning and common facilities without meeting the same financial obligation. When cash becomes scarce, something eventually gives. Maintenance is deferred, repairs are postponed, contractors remain unpaid, reserve funds may come under pressure and standards decline. That is why proper debt recovery should not be regarded as aggression. It is good governance. Know when to stop asking There must, of course, be a reasonable process. Accounts should be accurate, owners should be properly notified, genuine disputes should be considered, payments should be reconciled and legitimate administrative errors corrected. However, there comes a point when another reminder achieves nothing except another month’s delay. This is where owners’ association boards sometimes lose their nerve. Nobody particularly enjoys taking legal action against a fellow property owner. Boards may worry about confrontation, cost or criticism. Management may continue corresponding because correspondence creates the appearance that something is being done. Yet activity and achievement are not the same thing. Eventually, the question must change from: “Should we send another reminder?” to: “Who is going to recover this money?” That is where the choice of lawyer or law firm becomes extremely important. Rocking horse or racehorse There are rocking horses and there are racehorses. Both can generate plenty of activity, but only one actually takes you somewhere. The same distinction applies to professional advisers. Meetings, letters, telephone calls, reports, updates and invoices can create the appearance of tremendous activity. However, the real question is considerably simpler: are we actually getting anywhere? Over many years in business and investigative work, I have dealt with lawyers and law firms in several countries. An impressive office is not enough.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Mjk0MTkxMQ==