bahrainthismonth.com | FEBRUARY 2026 OPINION 76 In many residential towers across Bahrain, a simple question often produces surprisingly complex answers: Who, exactly, is responsible for managing the building? Ask a resident, and they may point to the property management company. Ask the management company, and they may refer to the owners’ association. Ask the owners’ association, and it may cite regulatory constraints or limited authority. Somewhere in this chain, responsibility blurs – and when responsibility blurs, standards tend to slip. This lack of clarity is not unique to Bahrain, nor does it reflect an absence of regulation. Rather, it highlights a familiar challenge in modern apartment living: multiple stakeholders, overlapping roles, and the assumption that someone else is ‘in charge’. The Illusion of Management Most residents assume that paying service charges guarantees professional oversight. Lifts operate, security staff are present, common areas are cleaned – so management must be happening. Yet visible services are only one part of true building governance. Effective management extends far beyond cleaning schedules and maintenance contracts. It includes enforcing bylaws, managing risk, ensuring regulatory compliance, addressing behavioural issues and protecting long-term asset value. When these responsibilities are unclear or inconsistently applied, buildings may function day to day while quietly declining over time. This is where a common misunderstanding arises: a building is a shared investment, not an individual one. Service charges are not simply a fee for convenience; they are a form of asset protection. Buildings rarely lose value suddenly – they deteriorate gradually through neglect. The Owners’ Association: Authority Without Visibility In principle, the owners’ association sits at the heart of building governance. It represents owners collectively, sets policy, approves budgets and oversees management companies. In practice, many owners remain disengaged. Some live overseas. Others view their unit purely as an investment. Attendance at meetings can be low and committee roles often fall to a small number of volunteers. As a result, authority exists on paper, but visibility, knowledge and influence are limited. Without active owner participation, decisions are delayed, enforcement becomes cautious and management companies operate defensively. The association may technically ‘run’ the building yet lack the momentum or expertise to shape outcomes meaningfully. This disengagement often stems from a flawed belief: “I don’t live there” or “I don’t use the facilities.” In shared ownership, these arguments do not remove responsibility. Common areas, systems and risks affect asset value regardless of occupancy. The Management Company: Executor, Not Governor Property management companies are frequently perceived as the ultimate authority. They issue notices, manage contractors and communicate with residents. Yet their role is often misunderstood. Real Estate and Property Management are at the core of Bill Grieve’s experience. In this series, he provides insight and opinion from both himself and people of standing in the real estate industry, helping to transfer knowledge and provide a platform for property owners and the wider sector. In conversation with Karine Nalbandyan – Licensed Property Manager, Real Estate Agent and Founder of Master House Real Estate in Bahrain. Who Really Manages the Building? An Eye on Real Estate
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy Mjk0MTkxMQ==